|
|
|||||||
1679 |
1Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
2Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Odense, Wisconsin
3Intern. Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College HealthcareNHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
4Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
5Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
6Dept. of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
7Dept. of Medical Endocrinology, South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
8Dept. of Medical Endocrinology, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Commercial Relationships: A.K. Sjolie, Astrazeneca and Takeda, R; R. Klein, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; N. Chaturvedi, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; M. Porta, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; J. Fuller, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; T. Orchard, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; R. Bilous, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R; H.-H. Parving, AstraZeneca and Takeda, R.
Clinical Trial: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00252694
Abstract
Purpose:DIRECT-Protect 2 was designed to examine whether candesartan treatment could slow progression and induce regression of retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes. We here report the results on regression of retinopathy with particular focus on blood pressure and other baseline risk factors.
Methods:DIRECT-Protect 2 was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-design, placebo-controlled trial in 309 centres globally, recruiting normoalbuminuric, normotensive (BP
Results:1905 participants were randomised. Regression on active treatment was significantly increased by 34% (HR 1·34, 95% CI 1·08-1·68, p=0·009). When analysing regression of retinopathy by hypertension treatment, the effect of treatment with candesartan appeared similar in patients with normal blood pressure at baseline compared to those on treatment for hypertension (p-value for heterogeneity=0.86). Hazard ratios and p-values in normotensive and hypertensive patients were 1.49 (p=0.035) and 1.27 (p=0.094), respectively. Subgroup analyses according to baseline retinopathy levels showed that regression was induced in eyes with level 35 on the ETDRS scale, whereas there was no effect in eyes with more severe retinopathy. The effect of candesartan on regression of retinopathy was consistent across subgroups based on baseline HbA1c, UAER and waist-hip ratio.
Conclusions:Treatment with candesartan in type 2 diabetic patients with mild to moderate retinopathy induced significant improvement in retinopathy over 4 years irrespective of hypertension status at baseline.
Keywords: diabetes retina clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials
130/85) or treated hypertensive (BP
160/90) people with type 2 diabetes with mild to moderately severe retinopathy (ETDRS levels 20-47). Retinopathy was assessed using the ETDRS severity scale. Photographs were taken at baseline and annually for at least 4 years. Regression was defined as a reduction by at least 3 or more steps of retinopathy on the ETDRS scale from baseline to any one follow-up visit, or 2 or more steps sustained at two consecutive follow-up visits.
© 2009, The Association for Research in Vision
and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Permission to republish any
abstract or part of an abstract in any form must be obtained in writing
from the ARVO Office prior to publication.
HOME
HELP
FEEDBACK
SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARCHIVE
SEARCH