ARVO Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubis, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dubis, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, J.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52: E-Abstract 1045.
© 2011 ARVO


1045—A447

The Relationship Between the Foveal Avascular Zone and Foveal Pit Morphology

Adam M. Dubis1A, Ben R. Hansen2, Robert F. Cooper3, Joseph Beringer1B, Yusufu Sulai4A, Alfredo Dubra4B and Joseph Carroll1B,1A

ACell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, BOphthalmology/Eye Institute, 1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
2Biomedical Engineering, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
AInstitute of Optics, BFlaum Eye Institute, 4University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

Commercial Relationships: Adam M. Dubis, None; Ben R. Hansen, None; Robert F. Cooper, None; Joseph Beringer, None; Yusufu Sulai, None; Alfredo Dubra, None; Joseph Carroll, None

Support: NIH (EY017607, EY001931, EY014537). J.C. is the recipient of a Career Development Award from RPB. A. Dubra-Suarez holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund.

Abstract

Purpose:To assess the relationship between foveal pit morphology, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and cone packing.

Methods:Thirty - six participants (age=23±4 years) were imaged with Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) and either the Retinal Function Imager (RFI) (Optical Imaging Ltd., Rehovat, Israel) or the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) at the University of Rochester. Depth, diameter, slope and volume of the foveal pit were extracted from the OCT thickness map. FAZ diameter and area were measured using the RFI or AOSLO images obtained. For inter-instrument comparison, two subjects were imaged using the RFI, AOSLO and fluorescein angiography (FA). Cone density was assessed using AOSLO at the University of Rochester.

Results:The FAZ was highly variable between individuals. Area ranged from 0.047 to 1.014 mm2 and average diameter ranged from 0.271 to 1.132 mm. The FAZ area was correlated with foveal pit depth (R2 = 0.2652, p = 0.0005) and diameter (R2 = 0.3503, p = 0.0005); deeper and broader foveal pits were associated with larger FAZ’s. The average foveal volume was 85.62 mm2 (range - 24.92 to 180.30 mm2). Foveal volume and FAZ area were correlated (R2= 0.4719, p<0.0001). In two subjects, the RFI, AOSLO and FA gave equivalent estimates of FAZ area and diameter. Preliminary results show that a subject with one of the smallest FAZ and smallest foveal pit had a higher than average cone density.

Conclusions:Our results are consistent with a developmental link between the FAZ and foveal pit formation, however, more work is needed to understand the relationship between these and other anatomical specializations of the human fovea.

Keywords: retinal development • macula/fovea • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound)

© 2011, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc., all rights reserved. Permission to republish any abstract or part of an abstract in any form must be obtained in writing from the ARVO Office prior to publication.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH